Sunday, December 4, 2011

Ex-Panamanian dictator to be extradited in weeks

(AP) ? Former Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega will be extradited to his homeland in the next few weeks, the French Justice Ministry said Thursday.

France and Panama have been working out the details of the extradition, Justice Ministry spokesman Bruno Badre told The Associated Press by telephone. A French court ruled on Nov. 23 that Noriega can be handed over to serve time for past crimes, more than 20 years after being ousted and arrested in a U.S. invasion.

Badre said "the judicial conditions have now been filled" for extradition and "this will occur in the next few weeks."

The elderly former strongman has been behind bars in Florida, on drug charges, and in France, for money laundering. Panama wants Noriega returned to serve prison terms handed down after he was convicted in absentia for embezzlement, corruption and murder.

The court decision came after months of legal procedures. Friends and foes alike feared that Noriega might die in a French prison ? notably Panamanians who fought against human rights abuses during his 1983-1989 regime.

Noriega, a one-time CIA asset, turned into an embarrassment for the U.S. after he sidled up to Colombia's Medellin drug cartel and turned to crime.

In Panama, he is accused of murdering opponents including Moises Giroldi, a military commander who led a failed rebellion two months before the U.S. invasion, and Hugo Spadafora, whose decapitated body was found on the border with Costa Rica in 1985.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2011-12-01-EU-France-Noriega/id-f086abc111b7438ca88320680d65d4a2

ice cream sandwich android ice cream sandwich android harry belafonte harry belafonte batman arkham city weather orlando the stand

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Snagged!

Apologies if this isn't formal or protocol but I'm fairly new at this affair.

Almost two months ago I started my own roleplay in this site but 'Life' happened and I have left my roleplay unattended since then. It may as well be considered dead by all standards so the question is how do I get this roleplay back up and running again? Or is it to the point where it is doomed to be left in a roleplaying scrapyard?

I just need a little something to breath a little life back into it although I have pondered about "advertising" it in other forums but I'm not too sure if that is appropiate or not.

Thank you for your time.

"The lowest form of life is a politician. The lowest form of politician is a liberal democrat."
-General George S. Patton

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RolePlayGateway/~3/WIwc3sYZsMY/viewtopic.php

order of operations carrie underwood eric church sara evans lionel richie cma awards cma awards

Friday, December 2, 2011

Kindle Fire software Version 6.2 now available; update manually or over Wifi

Kindle Fire update

Don't blink. If you do, you might miss your Amazon Kindle Fire updating to software Version 6.2. Amazon's not really saying what's new in the update other than "provides improvements to the operation of your Kindle Fire." But know that it does break root, so you'll have to jump through that hoop again (which you should be more than willing to do if you did it once already.)

The update's available over Wifi, or you can download it directly from Amazon, move it to your Kindle Fire yourself (just plug it in and drag the file onto it in your favorite file explorer), and go into the device settings and hit "Update your Kinde." It'll reboot a couple times, then all is well.

Download: Software Version 6.2; More: Amazon



Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/androidcentral/~3/CHkSzXVNqn8/story01.htm

pepper spraying cop somaya reece college board padma lakshmi juelz santana juelz santana greg halman

Rodgers thinks Tebow should tone down God talk

I?m assuming that there are many people who don?t know that Aaron Rodgers is a devout Christian. I?m assuming that because the Packers QB doesn?t talk about it much, doesn?t point to the sky after TD passes, and there isn?t a web site devoted to his prayer technique. So what does he think about the recent controversy over Tim Tebow wearing his religious beliefs on his sleeve? Rodgers, on his weekly ESPN Milwaukee radio segment with Jason Wilde on Tuesday:

?Well I started playing before Tim, so these are things I?ve thought about for a long time, and I think one thing that I try to look at when I was a younger player, and I mean, in high school, junior college, and Division one, I was always interested in seeing how guys talked in their interviews, talked about their faith, or didn?t talk about their faith. And then the reactions. I know Bob Costas at one point was critical about a player thanking Jesus Christ after a win, questioning what would happen if that player had lost, or do you really think God cares about winning and losing.

?I feel like my stance and my desire has always been to follow a quote from St. Francis of Assisi, who said, ?Preach the gospel at all times. If necessary, use words.? So basically, I?m not an over-the-top, or an in-your-face kind of guy with my faith. I would rather people have questions about why I act the way I act, whether they view it as positive or not, and ask questions, and then given an opportunity at some point, then you can talk about your faith a little bit. I firmly believe, just personally, what works for me, and what I enjoy doing is letting my actions speak about the kind of character that I want to have, and following that quote from St. Francis.?

Audio here.

So put Rodgers in the camp, I guess, that says Tebow should probably tone down all the God talk.

The interesting things about those quotes is that the part about St. Francis is almost word for word the same quote he gave in this Athletes in Action article in Oct., 2010:

?When it comes to talking to others about his faith, Rodgers is not one who preaches or pushes his faith on others. ?I like the saying from St. Francis of Assisi, ?Preach the gospel at all times, if necessary use words.? I try to live my life in a way that reflects my faith in the Lord,? Rodgers says. ?I don?t like to get in peoples? faces. The best way for me is: Let your actions talk about your beliefs, start a relationship with others, then finally there is a chance for questions.?

According to the Athletes In Action piece, Rodgers decided to ?dedicate his life to living for Christ? when he was 16.

?[Church youth group leader] Matt Hock was the first person who showed me how much fun and how cool it can be to be a Christian,? Rodgers says. Through ?Young Life? Rogers got involved in service mission projects and camp experiences, and built relationships that encouraged his and others? Christian faith to grow. He went on to be involved with Athletes in Action during his two years at the University of California, Berkeley.

?I grew up knowing what a stable relationship was by my parents? example and how it centered on Christ,? Rodgers says, ?When our family had its ups and downs, I knew my parents relied on God for everything and He always got us through those rough spots.?

And while we?re on the subject of God and the devil and such, here?s Rodgers on the Lions? Kyle Vanden Bosch:

?I mean, he?s crazy on the field. And if you watch the game, you see he wears those red contacts. He has a crazy motor. He wears red contacts on game day, I think he enjoys that perception that he?s a little bit off.?

***
Aaron Rodgers says there isn?t a recipe to beat the Packers [Sports Radio Interviews]

Source: http://offthebench.nbcsports.com/2011/11/30/aaron-rodgers-on-tim-tebow-religion-controversy-i-believe-in-letting-my-actions-speak-about-the-kind-of-character-i-have/related/

banana republic apple store academy barnes and noble nook bcs rankings 12 days of christmas a christmas carol

Republicans back payroll tax cut extension (Reuters)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) ? Republicans in Congress on Tuesday threw their support behind a payroll tax cut extension, trying to blunt charges ahead of 2012 elections of favoring wealthy Americans over middle-class workers.

Until Tuesday, Republicans had been lukewarm on extending President Barack Obama's payroll tax cut for workers, indicating they were open to negotiating it but never explicitly backing a measure, which the White House says will boost the country's sputtering economic recovery.

The move by Republicans could help avert an end-of-year battle with Democrats after months of bitter budget battles that brought the country to the edge of default in August and cost it its coveted AAA rating from Standard & Poor's.

Some analysts estimate the payroll tax cut is estimated to boost economic growth by as much as 1.5 percentage points.

"In all likelihood we will agree to continue the current payroll tax relief for another year," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said after a closed-door meeting of his colleagues.

McConnell said there was now "a majority sentiment" among Republicans for continuing the temporary tax cut.

The Republican leader said the Senate and House of Representatives also would work to strike a deal on another contentious issue: Democratic demands to extend unemployment benefits that begin to expire on December 31.

"First we need to do the payroll tax. It's like a puzzle. It will fit together," a Democratic aide said of the tax cut and jobless benefit extensions.

By early next year, 2.1 million people will lose their unemployment insurance if the program is not extended for those who have been unable to find work for an extended period, amid a 9 percent jobless rate.

Without congressional action by December 31, the payroll tax that workers pay would revert to 6.2 percent, up from the current, temporary 4.2 percent tax.

2012 ELECTION MANEUVERS

In political maneuvers foreshadowing the 2012 presidential and congressional election debates, Democrats are arranging a Senate vote later this week to extend and expand the payroll tax cut.

They want to offset the lost revenue with a 3.25 percent tax on income over $1 million a year, but Republicans vehemently oppose raising taxes on the rich, arguing that would hurt job creation.

If Republicans block the measure, as expected, Democrats would paint them as the party of the rich.

Trying to get ahead of the game, McConnell proclaimed Republican support for the payroll tax cut extension and told reporters his party would soon propose its own ideas for covering the cost of the tax cut.

"The Democrats put them in a box," said Andrew Taylor, a North Carolina State University political science professor. "I think many Republicans realized this is a bad side of the argument to be on."

The Democratic measure due to be voted on Thursday would not only extend the payroll tax cut for a year. It also would further cut the tax to 3.1 percent, from the current 4.2 percent, and also put employer payroll tax payments at the low rate too.

Top White House economist Alan Krueger said on Tuesday that extending the tax cut would strengthen the U.S. economy.

"This is a critical time for the economy and I think it's a time when the economy could use more medicine to strengthen and sustain the recovery," Krueger told a news briefing.

McConnell did not provide details on how Republicans would offset the cost of extending the tax cut. There has been speculation among some Democratic aides in Congress that Republicans could take aim at new federal subsidies under President Barack Obama's overhaul of the healthcare system.

While that likely would prompt Democratic opposition, a new round of ideas later in December could find bipartisan backing.

Among the ways to potentially cover the cost of renewing the payroll tax cuts are: cutting federal farm subsidies, selling some government assets, reducing federal pensions and administrative savings in the Medicare healthcare program for the elderly. All these ideas have been discussed in past budget negotiations.

(Additional reporting by Donna Smith and Thomas Ferraro; editing by Anthony Boadle)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/uscongress/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111130/pl_nm/us_usa_taxes

patriots vs jets adventureland sean hannity jose reyes kroy biermann nene leakes duggars

Thursday, December 1, 2011

House votes to end country limits for worker visas (AP)

WASHINGTON ? The House voted Tuesday to end per-country caps on worker-based immigration visas, a move that should benefit skilled Indian and Chinese residents seeking to stay in the United States and the high-tech companies who hire them.

The legislation, which passed 389-15, was a rare example of bipartisan accord on immigration, an issue that largely has been avoided during the current session of Congress because of the political sensitivities involved.

The measure would eliminate the current law that says employment-based visas to any one country can't exceed 7 percent of the total number of such visas given out. Instead, permanent residence visas or green cards would be handled on a first-come, first-served basis.

The bill, said its sponsor, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, "does encourage high-skilled immigrants who were educated in the U.S. to stay and help build our economy rather than using the skills they learned here to aid our competitor nations."

Currently, the State Department issues about 140,000 such green cards a year to foreign nationals working in the United States, often after getting degrees from U.S. universities.

The bill also changes family-based visa limits from 7 percent per country to 15 percent per country, an adjustment that could slightly ease the backlog for naturalized citizens, particularly from Mexico and the Philippines, trying to bring relatives into the country.

Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., who heads the Senate Judiciary panel on immigration, said he planned to move the bill as quickly as possible in the Senate, "where we expect it to find overwhelming support." He said the legislation would "remove outdated constraints that prevent us from attracting the kind of innovators who can create job growth in America."

The Obama administration in its first two years failed in several major efforts to change immigration law, and this year the issue has largely been off the table, with Republicans making clear that anything suggesting amnesty for those in the country illegally would be rejected.

The Chaffetz bill does not change the number of visas being issued, and groups representing immigrants said the bill would do little to resolve pressing immigration issues. However, they applauded Congress for showing it can act.

Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, said that while the bill won't bring significant changes, "we think this is a positive step forward." He said it was a good sign that "Republicans and Democrats are actually working on solutions."

Crystal Williams, executive director of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said the measure "makes the system a tiny bit fairer" and does "demonstrate that Congress can do something on immigration, however small."

She cited estimates that while someone from England might wait two or three years for a green card, an Indian could conceivably be on the waiting list for decades.

Still, because there will be no increase in visas issued, there will be losers. Hosin "David" Lee, president of the Korean-American Scientists and Engineers Association, said the bill would force engineers from South Korea to wait an additional two years in their immigration process to get green cards.

But Compete America, a group representing high-tech companies such as Google and Microsoft Corp. and research institutes, said the bill would correct a problem in which very small countries are subject to the same 7 percent cap as large countries such as India and China, which account for more than 40 percent of the world's population.

The lengthy waiting periods for people trained and working in the United States "are contributing to a reverse brain drain in the U.S. as frustrated professionals opt to return to their home countries to pursue their professional ambitions," Kevin Richards, senior vice president of Tech America, which represents the technology industry, said in a letter to lawmakers.

U.S. employers are prohibited under law from hiring foreign workers unless they show there are not sufficient U.S. workers willing and able to take the jobs.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/uscongress/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111130/ap_on_go_co/us_congress_immigration

diane sawyer clay matthews kenny chesney matt kemp derek fisher rumpelstiltskin rumpelstiltskin

Interesting HR822 Legal Questions | Shall Not Be Questioned

Andy from the comments asks, ?Does HR 822 allow me to take my ?high capacity? magazine to New York? Hmm? hadn?t thought about that.??That?s a good question. From my reading of the language of HR822, That?s rather questionable. Also, it would be questionable whether it would be legal, for instance, to carry hollow point ammunition in New Jersey under HR822. My feeling on both counts is that no, that you would have to abide by both the magazine limits and rules regarding hollow points, as would a resident of ?both those jurisdictions.

The other side of that coin would be an argument that the law authorizes the carry of a handgun, regardless of ?eligibility to possess or carry? the state may require, provided that you are not prohibited by federal law from gun possession, and have a valid license to carry. Therefore the language makes you qualified to carry a handgun, which would also, naturally, include magazines and ammunition.

I think the argument that you have to abide by rules on magazines and ammunition type is much stronger than the latter argument. If HR822 does pass, you might want to stick with New York, California, and New Jersey law on magazine capacity, and also New Jersey?s law on hollow-point bullets.

Related posts (automatically generated):

  1. Two Things To Watch For
  2. HR822 Replaced
  3. Language Available for HR822

Source: http://www.pagunblog.com/2011/11/30/interesting-hr822-legal-questions/

drew brees drew brees smokey robinson smokey robinson del rio del rio gilbert arenas